Thursday, 6 June 2013
Thursday, 11 April 2013
Privacy setting on my social network
What I have learnt is that no matter how much security you put on the only way to be truly safe is to be completely disconnected
Thursday, 14 March 2013
Privacy settings on my social networks
I have learnt that it is important to check your privacy settings, make them airtight
No regrets, Case study
1. Do you think Millersville University was justified in disqualifying Stacy from earning her teaching degree because of her profile page? Why, or why not? Think about the question from different perspectives, such as that of Stacy, her friends, school officials, community members, or parents of Stacy’s students. Remember that Stacy is an adult and as such this is not about about judging her behaviour but about considering issues of online privacy.
I believe that even though there was some method behind their reasons for rejecting her, I believe it was unfair to reject her, she was over the legal age, the photo does not show the cups contents, so the title could have been a joke.
2. How would the situation be different if the context of the photo were taken into account? For instance: What if the caption of the photo was not “Drunken Pirate,” but “Happy Halloween” or “My friend forced me to wear this pirate hat”? What if a post accompanying the photo said that it had been taken at a child’s birthday party and Stacy was drinking punch?
It would be no different, the picture shouldn't mean she loses her job anyhow.
3. What if Stacy’s friend Joe had posted the picture of Stacy without her knowing it, and tagged her with the “Drunken Pirate” caption. Does the fact that Joe posted the picture change the situation? Why or why not?
Like I said before, it would be no different, the picture shouldn't mean she loses her job. But it would also mean Joe should be punished for putting up a picture without someones permission.
4. Does Joe have a responsibility to ask Stacy before he posts (and tags) a picture of her? Do other people, including strangers who come across the photo online, have the responsibility to check with Stacy before they tag or repost the photo? Why, or why not?
Yes, it is common sense, you can't just put someone's photo on the internet for everyone to see without that persons permission
I believe that even though there was some method behind their reasons for rejecting her, I believe it was unfair to reject her, she was over the legal age, the photo does not show the cups contents, so the title could have been a joke.
2. How would the situation be different if the context of the photo were taken into account? For instance: What if the caption of the photo was not “Drunken Pirate,” but “Happy Halloween” or “My friend forced me to wear this pirate hat”? What if a post accompanying the photo said that it had been taken at a child’s birthday party and Stacy was drinking punch?
It would be no different, the picture shouldn't mean she loses her job anyhow.
3. What if Stacy’s friend Joe had posted the picture of Stacy without her knowing it, and tagged her with the “Drunken Pirate” caption. Does the fact that Joe posted the picture change the situation? Why or why not?
Like I said before, it would be no different, the picture shouldn't mean she loses her job. But it would also mean Joe should be punished for putting up a picture without someones permission.
4. Does Joe have a responsibility to ask Stacy before he posts (and tags) a picture of her? Do other people, including strangers who come across the photo online, have the responsibility to check with Stacy before they tag or repost the photo? Why, or why not?
Yes, it is common sense, you can't just put someone's photo on the internet for everyone to see without that persons permission
Monday, 18 February 2013
Attracting audiences
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4Va9XVtw6x8#!
Questioning Children Action Violence Unexpected
Questioning Children Action Violence Unexpected
Flat Earth Documentary
1. No, the information presented is false and is therefore not a documentary
2. To show what characteristics make a documentary
3. Because he was trying to show what a documentary should include, he put in all the features of a documentary
4. he used convincing tones o show he believed what he was saying
5. lots of Diagrams and assured tones are used to show confidence and authority
6. Diagrams and real pictures are used to show authenticity
7. Experts enhance the authority
8. most people know that it is false but don't know that the creator knows it is false so they notify them over and over
9. ?
10. ?
2. To show what characteristics make a documentary
3. Because he was trying to show what a documentary should include, he put in all the features of a documentary
4. he used convincing tones o show he believed what he was saying
5. lots of Diagrams and assured tones are used to show confidence and authority
6. Diagrams and real pictures are used to show authenticity
7. Experts enhance the authority
8. most people know that it is false but don't know that the creator knows it is false so they notify them over and over
9. ?
10. ?
Thursday, 24 January 2013
Analysing language in documentaries
Clip one Clip two
Enough want
Angry masses
Be Angry they realise they can get what they want - when they want
Enough want
Angry masses
Be Angry they realise they can get what they want - when they want
Thursday, 17 January 2013
Authority in Documents
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qgWkwUzumZg
All of the experts seem calm and confident, and for some reason middle aged men, they are allsitting behind a desk, making it seem like they are the boss.
Positives include stronger persuasion of point and authority to that point
Negatives include continuity if the 'expert' signs up to another documentary with a different opinion
The Stereotype seems to be older men wearing suits, rarely are young men and women shown.
All of the experts seem calm and confident, and for some reason middle aged men, they are allsitting behind a desk, making it seem like they are the boss.
Positives include stronger persuasion of point and authority to that point
Negatives include continuity if the 'expert' signs up to another documentary with a different opinion
The Stereotype seems to be older men wearing suits, rarely are young men and women shown.
Sunday, 13 January 2013
Do Documentaries Show Reality?
Authentic is something that is truthful or real, there are no major differences between the words real and authentic, aside from spelling so no, there are no differences between real and Authentic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wKCcCKdznlw
Authentic The interviews, the facts that were given, the accounts.
Inauthentic The footage of the events
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wKCcCKdznlw
Authentic The interviews, the facts that were given, the accounts.
Inauthentic The footage of the events
Saturday, 12 January 2013
How Motive Affects Content
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vIxEc4OYquY
- Teacher In Depth of how money came
- Journalist What happens in the making of money
- Entertainer Shows the funny side of things
- Artist The Designs of money
- Advocate Persuasion of paper or plastic money
- Investor The dangers of counterfeit money
Thursday, 10 January 2013
Codes and Conventions of documentaries
Locations, Background music, Information presented, language used, footage taken and people interviewed
RSS feed
I don't know how to set up one, I've spent at lest an hour trying to figure out how to se it up but I can't figure it out so there will not be one
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)